Dr. José Ángel ArranzDr. José Ángel Arranz
OUR COMMITMENT TO SCIENTIFIC RIGOR
Scientific Committee
MEMBERS OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE
Dra. Aránzazu GonzálezDra. Aránzazu González del Alba
Dr. Sergio VázquezDr. Sergio Vázquez
Dr. Rafael Areses GómezDr. Rafael Areses Gómez
Luis MalloLuis Mallo
Mission
To provide a meeting place for oncology-related professionals for training in, and critical appraisal of, the scientific literature in oncology: analysing study methodology, results and clinical significance in context, with a special focus on urological tumours.
Vision
To make the GU Analysis Club a multidisciplinary benchmark for the continuing education of oncology professionals, and other interested stakeholders, in the critical appraisal of scientific literature.
Our Values
Impartiality
Analysis and decision-making will be objective, free from external influences that could compromise the impartiality of scientific judgement, ensuring that all actions and assessments are carried out in a balanced and objective way.
Science communication
We are committed to sharing and analysing, with rigour and clarity, the most relevant findings in the field of tumours, combining statistical analysis with its clinical relevance in the current context, to make an impact on the management of these tumours.
Objectivity
We are committed to acting without personal, financial or any other interests interfering with our scientific responsibility, ensuring decisions free from external influence and preserving the integrity of the process.
Free and open access
At the Analysis Club, we firmly believe that knowledge is a right, not a privilege. That is why our resources are available to everyone, free of charge and without restrictions, guaranteeing equal opportunities to learn, share and grow as a community.
Commitment to excellence
We are committed to maintaining the highest quality standards in all our activities, always striving for continuous improvement and fostering innovation to achieve the best results in the scientific and clinical fields.
Prudence in criticism
Our criticism will always be constructive, based on sound arguments and expressed respectfully, keeping a thoughtful approach that fosters professional and scientific growth.
Functions of the Scientific Committee
Content Validation
Continuous Updating
Relevance Assurance
Objectivity Assurance
Quality Supervision
Guidance and Advice
Clinical Applicability
Fostering Innovation